NH Research Systems
NH Research Systems

NH Research Systems

NH Research Systems Replacement

获取更多信息

If your lab runs an NH Research cabinet, you already know how much of your validation programme depends on it. Battery cyclers, regenerative grid simulators, four-quadrant AC loads and high-current DC loads from NH Research sit at the centre of thousands of test benches in automotive, aerospace, defence, energy storage and national research laboratories. Many have been running for a decade or more.

That installed base is now facing a hard deadline. The NH Research product line has been retired, and standard service for the remaining families ends on 31 December 2026. Older NHR families lost standard service in mid-2025. After those dates, factory repair, calibration, spare modules and firmware support are no longer guaranteed.

This page is a practical reference for engineers and test managers in that position. It maps the complete NH Research cabinet line, separates the battery-oriented systems from the grid-oriented ones, explains what the support timeline actually means for a working lab, and sets out how Impedyme replaces or upgrades every major NHR cabinet family — usually with more capability than the cabinet being retired, not less.

What NH Research Built, and Why Those Cabinets Are Everywhere

NH Research spent more than fifty years building programmable power test equipment out of Irvine, California. The company's signature approach was the modular cabinet: a floor-standing enclosure taking three-phase mains input, populated with independent power modules that could be added, paralleled and reconfigured as a lab's power requirements grew.

Three design decisions made NHR cabinets popular and explain why so many are still in service:

  • Regeneration. Rather than burning absorbed energy as heat, NHR systems returned it to the mains at efficiencies above ninety percent. That cut utility cost, cut room cooling load, and made high-power battery cycling practical without a dedicated chiller plant.
  • Modularity. A cabinet could ship half-populated and be filled later. Individual modules were independently programmable, so one cabinet could run several units under test on different profiles at the same time.
  • Air cooling. NHR deliberately avoided liquid cooling on most families, trading power density for simpler facility requirements.

Those are genuine engineering virtues, and they are the reason a fifteen-year-old NHR cabinet is often still doing useful work. They are also the reason the end-of-support timeline hurts: this is not equipment that labs were planning to replace.

Three Kinds of NH Research Systems

NHR's range is easiest to think about not as a parts catalogue but as three families of purpose. Knowing which one you are standing in front of determines both your support horizon and your upgrade options.

Integrate, Upgrade, or Replace?

Three routes are open, and you do not have to decide before you start.

Integrate. Keep a cabinet that still works and add what it cannot do: 永磁同步电机 runs your plant model in real time on the same bench while the NHR system keeps doing the cycling or sourcing it does well.

Upgrade. Replace the limiting part of the bench, not all of it — usually emulation fidelity, where our 实时 电池仿真器 replaces a voltage-and-resistance approximation, or grid realism, where GridSim Studio adds live impedance modelling.

Replace. Start clean on a single platform when the cabinet is already at the edge of what it can prove. The CHP 系列 is regenerative, liquid cooled and parallelable, with one software environment across battery, grid and motor work.

How Impedyme Replaces Any NH Research Systems

We build FPGA-based 硬件在环power hardware-in-the-loop systems: the CHP 系列 cabinets, the 永磁同步电机 real-time engine, and the 关闭 suite. The hardware covers the same regenerative source-and-sink duty an NHR cabinet performs, and the real-time layer adds the model-based capability those cabinets never had.

What you run todayImpedyme replacementWhat changes
Battery cyclers for cell, module and pack testCHP Series with BatterySim StudioEquivalent regenerative bidirectional DC and channel structure, plus closed-loop BMS testing
Hardware battery emulationReal-Time Battery Emulator with BatterySim StudioFPGA cell modelling and per-cell emulation replace a fixed voltage-and-resistance approximation
Regenerative grid simulatorsCHP grid emulator with GridSim StudioDirect replacement, plus live grid-impedance modelling and a far tighter PHIL loop
AC power sourcesCHP grid emulator in source modeLike-for-like, with programmable disturbance libraries and automated IEEE 1547 sequences
Four-quadrant regenerative AC loadsCHP grid emulator in sink modeLike-for-like, plus model-based load behaviour
Programmable AC electronic loadsCHP in AC load modeReplacement with model-based and PHIL capability added
High-current and high-voltage DC electronic loadsCHP in DC load mode, or RCP-Box on smaller benchesReplacement with added real-time capability
Small modular bench loads for ATE and defence racksNo direct equivalentDifferent approach: we build system-level HIL and PHIL, not modular bench loads
NHR test-sequencing and reporting softwarePowerHIL Studio with the Impedyme Simulink BlocksetSequencing and reporting retained; model-based automation and MATLAB scripting added

NHR Battery: Cyclers, Emulators and Pack Test

The battery-side cabinets handle cell, module and pack cycling, drive-cycle profiles, and hardware emulation for testing a BMS or powertrain without a physical pack in the room.

What matters is channel count, emulation versus cycling time, fault-injection depth — and how much BMS validation still runs against a real pack because the emulation isn't trusted. That testing is slow, hazardous and never exactly repeatable, and most labs do it anyway.

Our path: CHP Series hardware with BatterySim Studio and the Real-Time Battery Emulator — an electrochemical cell model on FPGA, per-cell emulation stacking into full HV strings, with cell-level faults, impedance measurement and thermal coupling built in.

NHR Grid: Simulators, AC Sources and Four-Quadrant Loads

The grid-side cabinets cover inverter test, grid-tied validation, energy storage and certification against IEEE 1547, UL 1741 and IEC 61000 — sags, swells, harmonics, frequency excursions, and regenerative absorption.

The upgrade question is sharper here. A ride-through sequence is a ride-through sequence whoever builds the simulator; what differs is whether it can present a live grid impedance model, so you catch control instabilities against weak grids before a field deployment does. Certification proves compliance, not stability.

Our path: CHP Series grid emulator with GridSim Studio — automated IEEE 1547 ride-through sequences and real-time impedance modelling through a genuine PHIL loop, not a replayed waveform.

The Capability Gap Nobody Mentions

There is a second, less obvious reason to look at this now.

NH Research cabinets are excellent programmable sources and loads. You set a profile, the hardware executes it, the software logs the result. The battery-side cabinets even emulate a pack in hardware, using a voltage characteristic and a series resistance.

What they are not is real-time simulators. With one partial exception, NHR cabinets do not run a plant model in closed loop with the unit under test. One grid-side family offers a power amplifier mode intended for power hardware-in-the-loop work, with a loop latency in the region of fifty microseconds — usable, but an order of magnitude away from what modern power electronics validation asks for. No NHR cabinet executes a model on an FPGA, deploys a Simulink model to hardware, or closes a control loop in the microsecond class.

That matters because the hard failures in modern power electronics are not steady-state failures. They are transient and interaction failures: a battery management system that miscounts state of charge during a fast transient, an inverter control loop that becomes unstable against a particular grid impedance, a traction inverter whose fault response is correct in isolation and wrong in the vehicle. A programmable source cannot expose those. A model running in closed loop with the hardware can.

We call this the validation gap — the space between what bench equipment proves and what the product has to survive in the field. An NHR cabinet closes part of that gap. It was never built to close all of it.

So the honest framing of a replacement decision is not "how do we buy the same thing again?" It is "if we are replacing this cabinet anyway, what should the replacement be able to do that the old one couldn't?"

What the Ownership Changes Mean for Your Lab

NH Research was acquired in 2021 by a large test-and-measurement corporation, itself absorbed by a global industrial automation group in 2023. In September 2025 the remaining NHR products were retired, with end of standard service set for 31 December 2026 — service having already moved from the original Irvine facility to the acquirer's centres in Texas and Hungary.

Repair becomes uncertain

Once standard service ends, a failed power module or controller has no guaranteed factory repair path. Third-party repair covers some assemblies, but not proprietary control boards or firmware.

Calibration gets harder

Traceable calibration depends on manufacturer procedures and reference units. Losing that path complicates ISO 17025 audits and any certification resting on documented traceability.

Spares dry up

The used market is already absorbing decommissioned NHR systems — useful now, a warning for later. The spares pool is finite and is not being replenished.

Software is the quiet risk

Enerchron and the older emPower drive NHR hardware and nothing else. Years of test plans, drive-cycle profiles and reporting formats sit in an environment with no forward path — often on a control PC your IT department dropped years ago.

What a Migration Actually Involves

A cabinet changeover is a facilities project as much as a procurement one. The sequence we work through with labs looks like this:


常见问题

Is NH Research equipment still supported?
Partly, and not for much longer. The product line was retired in September 2025. Standard service for the remaining battery and grid cabinet families ends on 31 December 2026. The older load, source and power-supply test families reached end of standard service during 2025. Confirm the exact status of your own units before planning around these dates.
Which NH Research systems are affected?
All of them. The retirement covers the entire catalogue, not a subset. The difference between families is only the date on which standard service ended or ends.
Can Impedyme replace NH Research cabinets one for one?
For the high-power families, yes — battery cyclers, grid simulators, AC sources and four-quadrant loads all have a direct path. The exception is the small modular bench loads built for ATE and defence racks, where we do not offer a direct equivalent because we build system-level HIL and PHIL rather than bench loads.
What happens to our existing test sequences?
They do not transfer directly, because NHR's test software is tied to NHR hardware. We rebuild sequences, drive-cycle profiles and pass/fail criteria in PowerHIL Studio, which supports MATLAB scripting and version-controlled test plans. In practice most labs treat this as an opportunity to clean up test plans that have accumulated years of undocumented edits.
Do NH Research cabinets support hardware-in-the-loop testing?
Only in a limited sense. They can act as controlled power nodes inside someone else's HIL setup, and one grid-side family has a power amplifier mode for PHIL work at around fifty microseconds of loop latency. No NHR cabinet runs a plant model on an FPGA or deploys a Simulink model to hardware, so true model-in-the-loop testing is outside their design scope.

主菜单